Tag Archives: Bonnie Nadzam

The Week in Tweets

Oh, hey guys. Ever have that thing happen when Friday arrives and you’ve no idea what cool things in the world of publishing happened since Monday? Well, that’s why we’re going to start reviewing the week—in tweets!

Bonnie Nadzam’s Lamb was awarded the Flaherty-Dunnan First Novel Prize by The Center for Fiction. We reviewed Lamb way back in September, and had generally pleasant comments, noting its “sharp” prose and Nadzam’s willingness to focus on a topic has unpalatable as child molestation. Upon reflection, it’s a book that’s stayed with me; one driven by plot (gasp!), a plot that’s brave and unexpected and winding. Good for Nadzam. She deserves the honor.

You can read our review of Lamb here.

Now this one’s not really news. FotB (friend of the blog, peepz) John Warner made a pretty solid point here about Jeffrey Eugenides’ critically acclaimed third novel, The Marriage Plot. Though few would dispute its sheer pleasantness, The Marriage Plot isn’t a great book. It’s an example of a great writer’s great storytelling, but not a great writer’s great story. Get it? Kind of?

It’s fiction for a very particular crowd. And that crowd, as it happens, is already well catered to in the literary fiction genre.

You can still read our exchange from earlier this year at The Morning News, and the review that prompted it. You should also buy his debut novel, The Funny Man

There is a point when an organization’s or individual’s evilness transcends reality, becomes so imposing that it borders on comedy or camp or parody. What Amazon rolled out this week reads like an article from The Onion. Very short summary: Amazon will pay you up to $5 to scan items in local stores—using your smartphone—so long as you then purchase the item through Amazon. It’s bad enough that bookstores can’t compete with Amazon’s bargain-basement pricing; now Amazon is literally handing people money to not buy from other retailers. The good folks over at The Rumpus have got it right: Amazon is extremely wrong here.

And in response, we will no longer link our readers to Amazon. They’re everywhere already. You may have noticed in this post that we linked book titles to Powell’s, America’s (probably) most famous independent bookstore. (Another great idea from the fine folks at The Rumpus!) We don’t expect you to buy anything from Powell’s; just don’t buy from Amazon. Buy local—before it’s too late.

Tagged , , , , , , ,

Bonnie Nadzam’s “Lamb”

Workshop questions. Anyone who has ever participated in a college-level writing workshop knows what they are. Hearing them will likely send shivers down your spine. What is this piece’s emotional center? What is the scene and what is the story? What is my—no, what is the reader’s incentive to care about this piece?

What are the politics of this work?

That last one. Substitute ethics for politics and the same dry-heave of the soul occurs. It’s not that good writing doesn’t proffer ethical questions or hairy situations; it’s that it doesn’t have to; good writing can survive without the Big Questions. And there’s too often a willingness to ham-handedly inject these issues where they needn’t be. (On the flip side, there’s too often a willingness—especially on college campuses—to take ethics out of the equation altogether, to write a story about a guy twiddling his thumbs at a bus stop, because, well, why not?)

There are works, however, that can hinge on broad questions of ethics or politics without necessarily being preachy. Works that can make you feel, at least for a moment, ambivalent about your own pillars; works that can undermine societal standards, codes of conduct, etc. without baldly trying to undermine those standards and codes. It takes deftness, some skills at the literary sleight-of-hand.

Lamb, at times, succeeds at this. Bonnie Nadzam’s powerful debut novel tells the story of David Lamb, a just-past-middle-aged man who befriends an eleven-year-old girl named Tommie. Their relationship, however, is ethically murky.

Continue reading

Tagged , , ,

#fridayreads

What we’re reading, and what you should be reading too:

Bonnie Nadzam’s LAMB

Review for this will be up sometime next week. Story of an inappropriate relationship—quite inappropriate, actually.

David Grann’s “Trial by Fire”

Well, what do you know? The death penalty is in the news again! Shocking. Here’s one of the best pieces of reporting ever, one that will break your heart regardless of your politics.

Taylor Branch’s “The Shame of College Sports”

The pile-on of the NCAA continues, this time by a noted civil rights historian.

Robert Darnton’s THE GREAT CAT MASSACRE: AND OTHER EPISODES IN FRENCH CULTURAL HISTORY

I always return to this when I want enthralling, well-written cultural history; this sets the standard.

George Saunders’ “Bohemians”

Because no matter how much George Saunders you’re reading, you’re not reading enough George Saunders.

She’s on a bit of a getting-ready-to-give-birth kick at the moment, but normally the Lazy Self-indulgent Book Reviewer has really honest, witty things to say about all kinds of literature. Including romance novels. Check her out, unless you are against Tumblr, or Canadians (which would make you a crazy, crazy person).

Tagged , , , , , ,
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 67 other followers